Bridge - Engineering, Tacoma, Narrows (2024)

Tacoma Narrows

inbridgeinThe history of bridge design

verifiedCite

While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.

Select Citation Style

Feedback

Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

Britannica Websites

Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students.

  • bridge - Children's Encyclopedia (Ages 8-11)
  • bridge - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)

printPrint

Please select which sections you would like to print:

verifiedCite

While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.

Select Citation Style

Feedback

Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

Britannica Websites

Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students.

  • bridge - Children's Encyclopedia (Ages 8-11)
  • bridge - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)

Written by

Hubert Shirley-Smith,

Philip N. Billington Freelance writer.

Philip N. BillingtonAll

Fact-checked by

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. They write new content and verify and edit content received from contributors.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

Last Updated: Article History

In 1940 the first Tacoma Narrows Bridge opened over Puget Sound in Washington state, U.S. Spanning 840 metres (2,800 feet), its deck, also stiffened by plate girders, had a depth of only 2.4 metres (8 feet). This gave it a ratio of girder depth to span of 1:350, identical to that of the George Washington Bridge. Unfortunately, at Tacoma Narrows, just four months after the bridge’s completion, the deck tore apart and collapsed under a moderate wind.

At that time bridges normally were designed to withstand gales of 190 km (120 miles) per hour, yet the wind at Tacoma was only 67 km (42 miles) per hour. Motion pictures taken of the disaster show the deck rolling up and down and twisting wildly. These two motions, vertical and torsional, occurred because the deck had been provided with little vertical and almost no torsional stiffness. Engineers had overlooked the wind-induced failures of bridges in the 19th century and had designed extremely thin decks without fully understanding their aerodynamic behaviour. After the Tacoma bridge failed, however, engineers added trusses to the Bronx-Whitestone bridge, cable-stays to Deer Isle, and further bracing to the stiffening truss at Golden Gate. In turn, the diagonal stays used to strengthen the Deer Isle Bridge led engineer Norman Sollenberger to design the San Marcos Bridge (1951) in El Salvador with inclined suspenders, thus forming a cable truss between cables and deck—the first of its kind.

Lessons of the disaster

The disaster at Tacoma caused engineers to rethink their concepts of the vertical motion of suspension bridge decks under horizontal wind loads. Part of the problem at Tacoma was the construction of a plate girder with solid steel plates, 2.4 metres (8 feet) deep on each side, through which the wind could not pass. For this reason, the new Tacoma Narrows Bridge (1950), as well as Ammann’s 1,280-metre- (4,260-foot-) span Verrazano Narrows Bridge in New York (1964), were built with open trusses for the deck in order to allow wind passage. The 1,140-metre- (3,800-foot-) span Mackinac Bridge in Michigan, U.S., designed by Steinman, also used a deep truss; its two side spans of 540 metres (1,800 feet) made it the longest continuous suspended structure in the world at the time of its completion in 1957.

The 972-metre- (3,240-foot-) span Severn Bridge (1966), linking southern England and Wales over the River Severn, uses a shallow steel box for its deck, but the deck is shaped aerodynamically in order to allow wind to pass over and under it—much as a cutwater allows water to deflect around piers with a greatly reduced force. Another innovation of the Severn Bridge was the use of steel suspenders from cables to deck that form a series of Vs in profile. When a bridge starts to oscillate in heavy wind, it tends to move longitudinally as well as up and down, and the inclined suspenders of the Severn Bridge act to dampen the longitudinal movement. The design ideas used on the Severn Bridge were repeated on the Bosporus Bridge (1973) at Istanbul and on the Humber Bridge (1981) over the River Humber in England. The Humber Bridge in its turn became the longest-spanning bridge in the world, with a main span of 1,388 metres (4,626 feet).

Truss bridges

Although trusses are used mostly as secondary elements in arch, suspension, or cantilever designs, several important simply supported truss bridges have achieved significant length. The Astoria Bridge (1966) over the Columbia River in Oregon, U.S., is a continuous three-span steel truss with a centre span of 370 metres (1,232 feet), and the Tenmon Bridge (1966) at Kumamoto, Japan, has a centre span of 295 metres (984 feet).

In 1977 the New River Gorge Bridge, the world’s longest-spanning steel arch, was completed in Fayette county, West Virginia, U.S. Designed by Michael Baker, the two-hinged arch truss carries four lanes of traffic 263 metres (876 feet) above the river and has a span of 510 metres (1,700 feet).

Cable-stayed bridges

European designs

Beginning in the 1950s, with the growing acceptance of cable-stayed bridges, there came into being a type of structure that could not easily be classified by construction material. Cable-stayed bridges offered a variety of possibilities to the designer regarding not only the materials for deck and cables but also the geometric arrangement of the cables. Early examples, such as the Strömsund Bridge in Sweden (1956), used just two cables fastened at nearly the same point high on the tower and fanning out to support the deck at widely separated points. By contrast, the Oberkasseler Bridge, built over the Rhine River in Düsseldorf, Germany, in 1973, used a single tower in the middle of its twin 254-metre (846-foot) spans; the four cables were placed in a harp or parallel arrangement, being equally spaced both up the tower and along the centre line of the deck. The Bonn-Nord Bridge in Bonn, Germany (1966), was the first major cable-stayed bridge to use a large number of thinner cables instead of relatively few but heavier ones—the technical advantage being that, with more cables, a thinner deck might be used. Such multicable arrangements subsequently became quite common. The box girder deck of the Bonn-Nord, as with most cable-stayed bridges built during the 1950s and ’60s, was made of steel. From the 1970s, however, concrete decks were used more frequently.

The Vasco da Gama Bridge that crosses over theTagus Riverestuary inLisbon,Portugal, spanning 17.2 km (10.7 miles), was the longest bridge inEuropeat the time of its inauguration in 1998. It was surpassed by the controversial Crimean Bridge (also called the Kerch Strait Bridge), which was formally opened byVladimir Putinin 2018. The Crimean Bridge spans 19km (12miles) and was damaged by an explosion in 2022.

Bridge - Engineering, Tacoma, Narrows (2024)

FAQs

Who engineered the Tacoma Narrows Bridge? ›

Leon Moisseiff (1872-1943)

The lead designer of the 1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge, Leon Salomon Moisseiff, was at the peak of his engineering profession when the ill-fated span collapsed into the chilly waters of Puget Sound that November day.

What did engineers learn from the Tacoma Narrows Bridge disaster? ›

Failure of the 1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge revealed for the first time limitations of the Deflection Theory. Since the Tacoma disaster, aerodynamic stability analysis has come to supplement the theory, but not replace it. The Deflection Theory remains an integral part of suspension bridge engineering.

What was the flaw in the Tacoma Narrows Bridge? ›

Three key points stood out: (1) The principal cause of the Narrows Bridge's failure was its "flexibility;" (2) the solid plate girder and deck acted like an airfoil, creating "drag" and "lift;" and (3) aerodynamic forces were little understood and engineers needed to test all suspension bridge designs thoroughly using ...

How did they improve the Tacoma Narrows Bridge? ›

After the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse, the new bridge was redesigned (based on lessons learned) and rebuilt in 1950 (Fig. 4). The newly built bridge incorporated open trusses (triangular), stiffening struts and allowed the wind to flow freely through openings in the roadbeds.

Did the dog survive the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse? ›

"Tubby" the dog fell into fame when Galloping Gertie collapsed on November 7, 1940. As the only victim of that great disaster, Tubby has earned a special place in the hearts of many. His death symbolizes the drama of that terrible day. All that is known about the unfortunate pooch is here.

How deep is the water under the Narrows Bridge? ›

The water is over 200 feet deep. Swift, treacherous tides moving at over 8.5 miles per hour (12.5 feet per second) sweep through the channel four times a day.

What factors did the engineers of both the Titanic and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge fail to include in their engineering analysis? ›

QUESTION: What factor(s) did the engineers of both the Titanic and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge fail to include in their engineering analysis? ANSWER: In both the Titanic and Tacoma Narrows Bridge cases, the fatal mistake was that a purely static view of the design was used in the engineering analysis.

What was the physics behind the Tacoma Narrows Bridge? ›

Experts say that the source of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse is a phenomenon called "aerodynamically-induced self-excitation" or "aeroelastic flutter." Any small amount of twisting due to the bridge's shape created vortices or areas of low pressure, which eventually amplified its twisting motion.

Who paid for the Tacoma Narrows Bridge? ›

On June 23, 1938, the PWA approved nearly $6 million (equivalent to $129.9 million today) for the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. Another $1.6 million ($34.6 million today) was to be collected from tolls to cover the estimated total $8 million cost ($173.2 million today).

What is a fun fact about the Tacoma Narrows Bridge? ›

The current bridge is the 5th longest suspension bridge in the United States. Located on State Route 16 between Tacoma and Gig Harbor, the bridge is 5,979 feet in length. That's 40 feet longer than its predecessor, Galloping Gertie. Engineers designed the current bridge to carry 60,000 cars a day.

How many people died when the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapsed? ›

There were no human deaths in the collapse of the bridge. The only fatality was a co*cker Spaniel named Tubby, who perished after he was abandoned in a car on the bridge by his owner, Leonard Coatsworth.

How could the Tacoma bridge collapse been avoided? ›

The solution would be to use deep, open stiffening trusses with trussed floor beams. The truss members would be shallow, to avoid creating any large, solid surfaces like the ones associated with the failure of the 1940 Narrows Bridge.

What lesson did engineers learn from the Tacoma Narrows Bridge disaster? ›

Lessons learned

The Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse was a wake-up call for engineers and designers. It exposed their lack of knowledge and understanding of aerodynamic effects on suspension bridges.

Why can't you change lanes on the Tacoma Narrows Bridge? ›

"Those grates are slippery. They have a different surface on them than asphalt, and when cars drive over them, they can actually lose traction." The newer, eastbound Narrows bridge doesn't have a grated surface, and you're allowed to change lanes, Mitchell said.

How was the second Tacoma Narrows Bridge built differently? ›

The deck for the second bridge was built quite differently than the deck of the first. Crews raised steel beams singly or in sections. Assembling the deck, piece by piece, was like assembling a giant tinker toy. Bracing against the elements.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ray Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 6041

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ray Christiansen

Birthday: 1998-05-04

Address: Apt. 814 34339 Sauer Islands, Hirtheville, GA 02446-8771

Phone: +337636892828

Job: Lead Hospitality Designer

Hobby: Urban exploration, Tai chi, Lockpicking, Fashion, Gunsmithing, Pottery, Geocaching

Introduction: My name is Ray Christiansen, I am a fair, good, cute, gentle, vast, glamorous, excited person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.